<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike&#039;s Blabberings &#187; methodology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/tag/methodology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog</link>
	<description>on software, testing, and the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Culinary Analogy</title>
		<link>http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/2010/06/a-culinary-analogy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/2010/06/a-culinary-analogy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[software development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/?p=541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We used to build software like a crappy banana split stand.  Grab the banana off the shelf (which probably is about to expire), throw on ice cream, cover it in chocolate, add some cherries, whip cream, nuts, stir it up, put a spoon in it, hand it to the customer, take their money, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/bananasplit-242x300.jpg" alt="" title="bananasplit" width="242" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-543" /></p>
<p>We used to build software like a crappy banana split stand.  Grab the banana off the shelf (which probably is about to expire), throw on ice cream, cover it in chocolate, add some cherries, whip cream, nuts, stir it up, put a spoon in it, hand it to the customer, take their money, and let them walk away.</p>
<p>STOP THAT RIGHT NOW!</p>
<p>Stop the gargantuan effort up front, stop compromising the quality of pieces that don&#8217;t get seen, stop making your customer wait til the end of the project.</p>
<p>Find a beautiful banana and show it to your customer.  Let them take a bite.  That might be all they need.  Or they might want to take a small piece of it and try it in banana bread.  They might not like that.  But that&#8217;s OK, because we have lots of time and lots of banana left.  Take the next piece and make a banana smoothie for them.  Maybe add a strawberry for the next sip.</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/aaron_oliver" target="_blank">Aaron Oliver</a> might suggest that a good time to have these tastings is <a href="http://www.codesoftly.com/2010/06/dont-forget-the-meeting-after-the-standup-meeting.html" target="_blank">right after your daily stand-up</a>.</p>
<p>Let your customer be involved at each step.  Let them help you make the right changes early and often.  Be agile.  Don&#8217;t be the hobo behind the bad banana split counter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/2010/06/a-culinary-analogy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rally pairing</title>
		<link>http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/2010/05/rally-pairing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/2010/05/rally-pairing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[software development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iwein Fuld posted a great article about different styles of pair programming.  It&#8217;s a great post, and I encourage you to read it if you&#8217;ve tried pairing but haven&#8217;t bought in yet. His rally car analogy is spot-on.
My favorite driver is an outspoken dutch guy. He&#8217;s quick on the wheel and if he doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iwein Fuld posted a great article about different <a href="http://blog.xebia.com/2010/05/09/practical-styles-of-pair-programming/" target="_blank">styles of pair programming</a>.  It&#8217;s a great post, and I encourage you to read it if you&#8217;ve tried pairing but haven&#8217;t bought in yet. His rally car analogy is spot-on.</p>
<blockquote><p>My favorite driver is an outspoken dutch guy. He&#8217;s quick on the wheel and if he doesn&#8217;t get the idea I&#8217;m trying to convey to him he&#8217;ll just type something to try if that works. When he does get what I&#8217;m mumbling it&#8217;s on the screen faster than when I would have typed it myself, so it doesn&#8217;t give me time to get frustrated over things not being like the would be when I had the keyboard. And that gives me time to look for exits and pittfalls.
</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/rally-300x187.jpg" alt="" title="rally" width="300" height="187" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-487" /></p>
<p>He also dismisses anyone that tries to say pairing isn&#8217;t as effective as coding solo.</p>
<blockquote><p>No you&#8217;re not faster on your own, you&#8217;re just creating more crap for your colleagues to puzzle over and eventually delete. The code you write alone sucks. That guy that is getting on your nerves is trying to tell you (clumsily) that your code sucks, try to listen to him and you&#8217;ll turn into a better programmer. Or maybe you can teach him something and he&#8217;ll stop getting on your nerves. &#8230; If you&#8217;re slowing the other guy down, that&#8217;s a good thing. That will prevent him from writing code that you cannot maintain. If you don&#8217;t feel worthy of your colleagues code, get over it, or get off the team.</p></blockquote>
<p>My biggest stumbling block to date has been the ratio of time driving to navigating when you&#8217;re pairing a senior and junior dev.  Trying to balance productivity and mentoring isn&#8217;t always easy.  I find allowing the Sr. dev to drive 2/3 of the time and Jr. dev to drive 1/3 strikes close to the optimal balance.  Any more driving for the Sr and you&#8217;ll lose the Jr entirely as he rides along for the tour.  Any less and you lose valuable time in guiding-by-doing.</p>
<p>Whether you&#8217;re the driver or navigator, take your role seriously.  Share in the responsibility and help foster a mutual respect for the other.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mike-griffith.com/blog/2010/05/rally-pairing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

